This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 6, 2020. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
Optimize DIV for some common divisors #2327
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
how were these divisors selected? benchmark results? |
rphmeier
reviewed
Sep 26, 2016
TWO_POW_96 => a >> 96, | ||
TWO_POW_224 => a >> 224, | ||
TWO_POW_248 => a >> 248, | ||
_ => a.overflowing_div(b).0, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
couldn't these be put into the implementation of div
itself for U256
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it's better here - it's for evm's specific use cases. Uint is supposed to be general purpose library I don't think it suits well there. Probably would be better to use a different division algorithm there in additon.
gavofyork
added
M4-core ⛓
Core client code / Rust.
A6-mustntgrumble 💦
Pull request has areas for improvement. The author need not address them before merging.
A8-looksgood 🦄
Pull request is reviewed well.
and removed
A0-pleasereview 🤓
Pull request needs code review.
A6-mustntgrumble 💦
Pull request has areas for improvement. The author need not address them before merging.
labels
Sep 26, 2016
Selected by building a histogram for a few thousand recent blocks. This improves import time for some of the heavy blocks by a factor of two |
arkpar
changed the title
Optimize DIV for some common divizors
Optimize DIV for some common divisors
Sep 27, 2016
jacogr
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 29, 2016
* master: Fixing Delegate Call in JIT (#2378) Prioritizing re-imported transactions (#2372) Revert #2172, pretty much. (#2387) correct sync memory usage calculation (#2385) Update gitlab-ci Fix the traceAddress field in transaction traces. (#2373) Removing extras data from retracted blocks. (#2375) fixed #2263, geth keys with ciphertext shorter than 32 bytes (#2318) Expanse compatibility (#2369) Specify column cache sizes explicitly; default fallback of 2MB (#2358) Canonical state cache (master) (#2311) make block queue into a more generic verification queue and fix block heap size calculation (#2095) Hash Content RPC method (#2355) Reorder transaction_by_hash to favour canon search (#2332) DIV optimization (#2327) Error when deserializing invalid hex (#2339) Changed http:// to https:// on some links (#2349) add a test fix migration system, better errors # Conflicts: # .gitlab-ci.yml
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Labels
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.