-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 747
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
polkadot-omni-node
: Fully remove benchmark
sub-command
#5564
Comments
@bkontur @mordamax it seems like you are taking steps towards making the omni bencher work. Can you please share how you feel about commitment and the amount of work that is left? if you need any support? As you see in the project board, this is not super time sensitive for omni-node, but it is good to get an idea. |
re #5545 i hope should be done and merged within this week |
From my perspective, this is also a blocker or prerequisite: #5327 (refactoring testnet runtimes to use After that, we need to fix frame-omni-bencher #5083. We have a hotfix/workaround here, but I think there's a bug "elsewhere," and I'd like to investigate the real cause before we merge the hotfix/workaround. I plan to look into it next week, as I'm currently focused on higher-priority tasks. Once both are fixed/merged, we can proceed with merging #4405, which enables short benchmarks with frame-omni-bencher for CI. After that, we can safely remove the benchmarking code from omni-node. |
I think the latest development in this discussion was that omni-node should still expose benchmarking commands, but they should call into the same code also used by frame-omni-bencher. |
... And make
frame-omni-bencher
work for all use cases, such as: #5303Original issue for @serban300:
frame-omni-bencher
#5706frame-omni-bencher
+ extractchain-spec-builder
stuff toget_preset
polkadot-fellows/runtimes#379The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: