-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
Lots of alerts about task that has ended unexpectedly #3786
Comments
Has this recently changed or been a constant niggle? I'm just wondering if we suddenly have a lot more large statements than usual (i.e. after we have rolled out some code change)? |
This has already been discussed multiple times, the problem is that the alerting rules live in the substrate repo: https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/blob/master/.maintain/monitoring/alerting-rules/alerting-rules.yaml However, it doesn't make any sense because they are mainly polkadot specific. We should finally move them to polkadot and modify them properly. |
But this is really not Substrate code related. |
We could simply remove this alert altogether. As far as I can remember it has only once detected an actual issue with a task. All the other alert triggers have been false positives. |
That is actually a real good question. We should mostly have large statements on parachain runtime upgrades (or on large messages). |
On Kusama we get logs of alerts:
producing a lot of noise. I believe @tomaka mentioned that there is some heuristic to detect whether a task is supposed to stay running or is short lived. In this particular case the task is short lived (spawned to fetch some data, once it succeeds it will stop), so the heuristic seems to be wrong.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: