You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In van der Ark (2001) it is stated that "Moreover, a GRM’s β_{jx} must satisfy the ordering β_{j1} < β_{j2} < ... < β_{jm}" (with reference to Samejima (1969, p. 23), which I think lays out the necessary conditions for category specific effects for a cumulative ordinal model (COM). I think it would be good to separate the current function cs and a function for category specific effects for COMs, since there is no necessary restriction of this type for sequential and adjacent-category models, maybe something like ocs (ordered category specific).
References:
Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph Supplement.
Van Der Ark, L. A. (2001). Relationships and Properties of Polytomous Item Response Theory Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25(3), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/01466210122032073
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
StaffanBetner
changed the title
Category specific effects for cumulative ordinal model
(Ordered) Category specific effects for cumulative ordinal model
Dec 9, 2020
Peterson and Harrell (@harrelfe) (1990) calls it an unconstrained partial proportional odds model, see page 5 in the reference. Seems to be implemented in a Bayesian way in the package rmsb.
Peterson, B., & Harrell Jr, F. E. (1990). Partial proportional odds models for ordinal response variables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 39(2), 205-217. http://hbiostat.org/papers/feh/pet90par.pdf
I checked the code of the rmsb package, and it doesn't seem to constrain the category specific effects at all.
I have decided to experimentally allow cs() for cumulative models (with a warning). It the few tests I have run, it seems to work well generally, but unsurprisingly some divergent transitions occur when the chain moves into an invalid space. How much that invalidates the results in this case, I cannot tell at this point.
In van der Ark (2001) it is stated that "Moreover, a GRM’s β_{jx} must satisfy the ordering β_{j1} < β_{j2} < ... < β_{jm}" (with reference to Samejima (1969, p. 23), which I think lays out the necessary conditions for category specific effects for a cumulative ordinal model (COM). I think it would be good to separate the current function
cs
and a function for category specific effects for COMs, since there is no necessary restriction of this type for sequential and adjacent-category models, maybe something likeocs
(ordered category specific).References:
Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph Supplement.
Van Der Ark, L. A. (2001). Relationships and Properties of Polytomous Item Response Theory Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25(3), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/01466210122032073
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: