We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
For first implementation of #1088 only the simpler case for single models was implemented. Support for brm_multiple has a WIP code at https://github.com/martinmodrak/brms/tree/extended_cache_brm_multiple but incorporation awaits better support for testing if it works.
brm_multiple
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We should also consider #997 in the process as we will need to store all data.frames in the brm_multiple object.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Can I help testing it? This would save me hours of re-running the models. It feels like on_change is especially beneficial with MI.
on_change
I will let you know once there is an implementation to test.
No branches or pull requests
For first implementation of #1088 only the simpler case for single models was implemented. Support for
brm_multiple
has a WIP code at https://github.com/martinmodrak/brms/tree/extended_cache_brm_multiple but incorporation awaits better support for testing if it works.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: