Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch default $Pod::Simple::HTML::Perldoc_URL_Prefix to https://metacpan.org/pod/ ? #61

Closed
mohawk2 opened this issue Dec 27, 2014 · 2 comments

Comments

@mohawk2
Copy link

mohawk2 commented Dec 27, 2014

No description provided.

@jberger
Copy link

jberger commented Dec 27, 2014

My $0.02, not that anyone asked. I prefer metacpan too, and yet sco has historical sway. I would offer the owner/operator (GBARR?) a chance to open it, I say we let them have a chance to remain king. If they won't, I can't see how we should support it with a viable open alternative present.

The difference between SCO and say BPO (http://blogs.perl.org) on a closed source platform is that there is no viable open source multiuser blog platform to rival it. BPO is also closed source, commercial in fact, but actually I understand that better. it's an advertisement for a product built in Perl, donated to the community for free use. What good does a closed source SCO do anyone?

I think the community should decide to offer its support behind the most viable and open alternative when a choice like this presents itself. If SCO chooses to be that, then, so be it. Otherwise, my vote would be for MetaCPAN.

P.S. Some have floated "being cautious about publicizing negative opinions". Indeed that's always a wise course. That said, I don't believe that's what I'm saying. I hope that SCO would choose to open source, that it would become more responsive to feature requests and bug fixes, that it would be a model for other open source perl sites. I hope that people can see this as a fact-based argument and not a personal one.

@theory
Copy link
Contributor

theory commented Dec 29, 2014

This discussion should be directed to pod-people.

@theory theory closed this as completed Dec 29, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants