Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Post as a community RFC and respond to feedback for six weeks #29

Closed
Tracked by #1
theory opened this issue Sep 3, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed
Tracked by #1

Post as a community RFC and respond to feedback for six weeks #29

theory opened this issue Sep 3, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
community Collaborate with and develop consensus with the Postgres community design Designing the architecture, protocols, tools, and interfaces for PGXN v2 metadata Changes to the PGXN Meta spec or libraries

Comments

@theory
Copy link
Member

theory commented Sep 3, 2024

Post and publicize PGXN Meta v2 and solicit feedback.

@theory theory mentioned this issue Sep 3, 2024
5 tasks
@theory theory self-assigned this Sep 3, 2024
@theory theory added design Designing the architecture, protocols, tools, and interfaces for PGXN v2 community Collaborate with and develop consensus with the Postgres community labels Sep 3, 2024
@theory theory added this to the 2. 🗃️ Metadata milestone Sep 3, 2024
@theory
Copy link
Member Author

theory commented Sep 3, 2024

Done a few different ways:

Expect the RFC to be accepted and merged only after it has been refined through the development of binary packaging automation.

@theory theory closed this as completed Sep 3, 2024
@theory theory added the metadata Changes to the PGXN Meta spec or libraries label Sep 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
community Collaborate with and develop consensus with the Postgres community design Designing the architecture, protocols, tools, and interfaces for PGXN v2 metadata Changes to the PGXN Meta spec or libraries
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant