Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Verify/fix degenerate state handling. #38

Open
Tracked by #26
phockett opened this issue Jul 28, 2021 · 1 comment
Open
Tracked by #26

Verify/fix degenerate state handling. #38

phockett opened this issue Jul 28, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@phockett
Copy link
Owner

phockett commented Jul 28, 2021

Handling of degenerate states (it variable) needs some general though.

Currently:

  • Select or keep it dim working OK in general, but may lead to accidental dropping or neglect of degenerate components.
  • For AFBLMs using tensor formalism (see GeomFunc todo & tidy-up #26 ), may have phase issues with it>1, resulting in -ve cross-sections (or null values if summed over), although betas seem correct (only tested for N2 orb6/pig case so far). Not yet sure if this is issue in formalism (missing phase or rotation?), assumptions or numerics. Quick fix might be to just set degeneracy factor here?
@phockett phockett mentioned this issue Jul 28, 2021
9 tasks
@phockett
Copy link
Owner Author

phockett commented Aug 11, 2021

Updates:

MF codes still need some attention, but generally not an issue for MFPADs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant