Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add coprocessor support in TiFlash #161

Merged
merged 105 commits into from
Oct 17, 2019
Merged

Add coprocessor support in TiFlash #161

merged 105 commits into from
Oct 17, 2019

Conversation

zanmato1984
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@zanmato1984
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-integration-tests

@zanmato1984
Copy link
Contributor Author

  1. catch (...);
  2. align region status with tikv;
  3. consider using pipeline for encoding output stream;
  4. consider order by remove;

* 1. remove duplicate agg funcs, 2. for column ref expr, change column_id to column_index since the value stored in column ref expr is not column id

* bug fix
required_columns.push_back(pk_handle_col->get().name);
auto pair = storage->getColumns().getPhysical(pk_handle_col->get().name);
source_columns.push_back(pair);
is_ts_column.push_back(false);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If pk_handle_col->get().tp is TiDB::TypeTimestamp, this chould be true?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, timestamp col will never be pk handle col

Copy link
Contributor

@lidezhu lidezhu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@birdstorm birdstorm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@zanmato1984
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-integration-tests

3 similar comments
@zanmato1984
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-integration-tests

@zyguan
Copy link
Contributor

zyguan commented Oct 17, 2019

/run-integration-tests

@zanmato1984
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-integration-tests

@zanmato1984 zanmato1984 merged commit 5771f0c into master Oct 17, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants