New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider using detekt (without ktlint formatting) on ktlint itself #2923

Open

paul-dingemans opened this issue Jan 12, 2025 · 0 comments

Collaborator

paul-dingemans commented Jan 12, 2025

As Detekt also contains Ktlint, I wonder what happens when I make a change in ktlint > that conflicts with the older version of Ktlint in Detekt.

Detekt contains ktlint on a first party plugin. I mean, we have an integration with ktlint but you need to opt in. By default you can use detekt without ktlint. That I guess it would be the desired configuration for this project if you use it.

Originally posted by @BraisGabin in #2901 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment