-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 460
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pipecat and multi agent structure question #916
Comments
This is definitely possible with Pipecat. There are a few ways you could build it, but they will all use function calling with the Pipecat LLM. The simplest version, off the top of my head: When you create your Pipecat LLM service, you'd include a special tool call definition in your system prompt, named something like For more complex interactions, you may want to look at Pipecat Flows. It's a really powerful way to define conversation flows. You can even build flows dynamically, so your Planner could return Pipecat Flow nodes instead of just LLM responses. |
Thanks for that, in fact I found not too soon after publishing my question pipecat-flows and I am using it now and fits pretty well to my needs, thanks a lot! 😎 |
Question
Hi, I come with a question on integrating pipecat into my project.
I have the need to create an agent, let's call it Planner, which is the agent that coordinates what to do and which agents to call.
If I want to integrate pipecat and once we have a user text input to send a summary of what is being said to the Planner, so the planner can decide what flow to trigger, can I do that with pipecat?
If I use the function call option will the LLM of pipecat framework properly wait for the answer from the other agent?
Basically what I am talking about here is a multi agent project where the pipecat with daily would be in, but not necessarily the other agents are built in the same framework (I could use pipecat and autogen for instance).
any help is appreciated, thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: