We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
We need to improve the tooling of the repository to increase code-quality and simplify test process
Discussion: @piskvorky @mpenkov wdyt to add automatic code-formatter like https://github.com/google/yapf or https://github.com/ambv/black, I want to drop all discussions about code-style at all (honestly, I want to do it for Gensim, but smart_open are good candidate for test this approach, because it simple and small).
smart_open
Why I think this is useful:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
uri
parsed_uri
smart_open_lib
Fine with me of course, good idea. As long as we can enforce, or at least allow, hanging indent (not vertical) and lines longer than 80 chars.
Sorry, something went wrong.
I, for one, enjoy flame wars about code style :)
But let's give it a try. If it makes our lives easier, and the code better, then that can't be a bad thing.
mpenkov
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
We need to improve the tooling of the repository to increase code-quality and simplify test process
Discussion: @piskvorky @mpenkov wdyt to add automatic code-formatter like https://github.com/google/yapf or https://github.com/ambv/black, I want to drop all discussions about code-style at all (honestly, I want to do it for Gensim, but
smart_open
are good candidate for test this approach, because it simple and small).Why I think this is useful:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: