Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Asyncio support #119

Open
bitnom opened this issue Aug 31, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Feature Request: Asyncio support #119

bitnom opened this issue Aug 31, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@bitnom
Copy link

bitnom commented Aug 31, 2020

It would be nice to have sqlitedict methods as co-routines. Thoughts?

@longnetwork
Copy link

sqlitedict runs in threads with a single connection or in processes with multiple connections. This works without using locks in the python code. all necessary synchronizations are at the sql driver level. Great job! I gave up on leveldb because of the inability to work with multiprocesses. sqlitedict - no problem. I use it to cache large constants on disk (smartcontract codes)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants