You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The global Boolean variable SuppressMessageBoxes already suppresses the effect of a missing NoMessageBoxes define, but it is not obvious these are correlated.
Adopt documentation/comments to make their relation more obvious.
Time permitting, I will submit a pull-request.
Original title
Have NoMessageBoxes depend on a global boolean
Original
Sometimes I want the NoMessageBoxes to depend on run-time circumstances, for instance:
force NoMessageBoxes when running as a standalone process
disable NoMessageBoxes when running under the debugger
For that, it would be nice if NoMessageBoxes was implemented through a global variable.
Time permitting, I will submit a pull-request.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
jpluimers
changed the title
Have NoMessageBoxes depend on a global boolean
Correlate NoMessageBoxes with SuppressMessageBoxes in documentation/comments
Aug 9, 2018
Edit
The global
Boolean
variableSuppressMessageBoxes
already suppresses the effect of a missingNoMessageBoxes
define, but it is not obvious these are correlated.Adopt documentation/comments to make their relation more obvious.
Time permitting, I will submit a pull-request.
Original title
Have NoMessageBoxes depend on a global boolean
Original
Sometimes I want the
NoMessageBoxes
to depend on run-time circumstances, for instance:NoMessageBoxes
when running as a standalone processNoMessageBoxes
when running under the debuggerFor that, it would be nice if
NoMessageBoxes
was implemented through a global variable.Time permitting, I will submit a pull-request.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: