Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conventional extension for squashfs files: .sqfs, .sqsh, .squashfs etc ? #265

Closed
prioux opened this issue Sep 29, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Comments

@prioux
Copy link

prioux commented Sep 29, 2023

Hi there.

Not sure if this has already been covered or discussed in the past, but I'd like to know if there is an established, accepted convention for the extension we should use for squashfs filesystems.

I can see in the documentation (right here on GitHub) that this is not completely consistent. There are examples using both .sqsh and .sqfs. I've also seen out there .squashfs and .sqs.

Personally, I dislike .sqsh, because the letters sh are strongly associated in my mind to the word shell. A file named .sqsh seems to be a script for some sort of SQ shell. Consider how we immediately think of shells when we see files named init.bash, init.tcsh, init.ksh, init.sh, etc etc.

I like .sqfs however, it's pretty clear with the letters fs that we're talking about a filesystem.

If that's OK with the developers, I volunteer to make a PR to update all the documentation here and make sure all examples use .sqfs as an extension (my preference, as I said) or whatever else people prefer.

@prioux
Copy link
Author

prioux commented Sep 29, 2023

Sorry if this is a duplicate. Also, if a convention already exists, we could update the Wikipedia page's side bar and add the extension name there.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SquashFS

@Dr-Emann
Copy link

See also #259

@prioux
Copy link
Author

prioux commented Oct 3, 2023

All good. Thanks!

@prioux prioux closed this as completed Oct 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants