-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rpoly fail, Python crash #2
Comments
Dear Shelley, the error message your sent that looks like ellc is being called with invalid input, e.g., with one star larger than its Roche lobe. I would need to know exactly what parameters were used in the call to ellc to investigate further. -Pierre |
Dear Pierre, Thank you for your reply! Do you know of any binary modeling tools that can model systems close to Roche overflow? The parameters I used that caused the error are: The fit works if I have r1/a = 0.14770604802197895 = 25 Rsun/a, but fails when I set it to 26 Rsun/a=0.1536142899428581. -Shelley |
Hi all, I am having this exact same issue. When rpoly fails, the entire Python kernel crashes. This makes it difficult to do any sort of optimization over the light curve parameters in case the radius reaches its Roche lobe. |
Hi! I'm trying to fit a lightcurve of a system very near roche overflow, and I sometimes get the expected "star 1 exceeds limiting radius" result. However, sometimes I get a "ell_ell_roots: rpoly fail" error that prints out a list with NaNs and zeros. Python then crashes.
I'm wondering if there's a workaround to this issue? Any insights would be very helpful!
Here's what the Terminal output looks like:
ell_ell_roots: rpoly fail, a T NaN
NaN NaN NaN
NaN
-1.0000000000000000 -1.4660523332313850E-002 -0.97144512031722485
2.5308722549527402E-002 -5.8516435879507334E-002 1.0824066953850998E-002
0.12480462418495529 0.12223997195976140 2.6197617077951593E-002 -
6.0631841597696981E-002 1.9701140691243557 4.7928494913314391E-002 -0.
38878985079685596 0.92132646326769452
NaN 0.0000000000000000 NaN
NaN NaN NaN
NaN NaN NaN
NaN 0.0000000000000000 NaN 1
.0000000000000000 0.0000000000000000
NaN NaN NaN
NaN NaN
0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: