-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Will inference ever be supported? #15
Comments
Hi @CestLucas! If you mean this feature of Neo4J - https://neo4j.com/labs/neosemantics/4.0/inference/ it looks very interesting and worth implementing into SliccDB. I have two ideas how this could work, but I will gladly welcome any input on your part: Categories Families Happy to hear your feedback or propositions tho! Kind Regards |
Thanks for the write up @pmikstacki ! Much appreciated. I think a simple route finder similar to https://github.com/jchristn/LiteGraph can be a great start: // Find a route This would tell if two concepts are connected via any multi-hop path, for instance pug->dog->canine->animal so a pug is an animal ;) |
Oh, I see that this is just graph traversal. Actually I've never thought of that because I use sliccDB for use cases not requiring this feature. I will try to implement it by next week :) Kind Regards |
Any news on this feature ? |
I am currently working around this issue by using QuikGraph. That is I transform the SliccDB graph into a QuikGraph data structure and then do the interference. |
First of all big thanks to SliccDB devs! We were looking at server-less solution to Neo4j but we need to be able to infer concept relations, i.e. check if two concepts are connected via a path. Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: