Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gutenberg template builder #4667

Closed
2 tasks
sc0ttkclark opened this issue Dec 13, 2017 · 8 comments
Closed
2 tasks

Gutenberg template builder #4667

sc0ttkclark opened this issue Dec 13, 2017 · 8 comments
Assignees
Labels
Status: Help Wanted We have not prioritized this yet, but you can help make it happen to speed it up Type: Feature Features that add entirely new functionality that was not there before

Comments

@sc0ttkclark
Copy link
Member

Be able to build a Gutenberg template (for a post type) using Gutenberg itself.

  • Can add, remove, and move blocks via Gutenberg
  • Unable to edit various settings or edit content of blocks (nice to have, but templates can't take on block initial settings from what I gather so the settings would just go away and not be shown on next template re-edit)
@sc0ttkclark sc0ttkclark added Type: Feature Features that add entirely new functionality that was not there before Status: Help Wanted We have not prioritized this yet, but you can help make it happen to speed it up labels Dec 13, 2017
@sc0ttkclark sc0ttkclark added this to the Pods 2.8 milestone Dec 13, 2017
@sc0ttkclark sc0ttkclark self-assigned this Dec 13, 2017
@ladislavsulc
Copy link

Hello. I could help with my perspective regarding UX/UI but I need more information. Is there any concept at the moment? Any limits? How does your current interaction design workflow works? I could collaborate using Figma.com.

@sc0ttkclark
Copy link
Member Author

No concept yet, but the best way for you to get into it would be to play with gutenberg a little bit and try to pretend that instead of laying out content for a post, that you're actually laying out a template for a post type to use that is then filled in with content by the person using the post editor.

@benallfree
Copy link

benallfree commented Jan 31, 2018


edit: nevermind :D

@lkraav
Copy link
Contributor

lkraav commented Jan 31, 2018

@benallfree it's definitely in (active!) scope, as evidenced by WordPress/gutenberg#3745

Nested blocks is the only way forward, indeed.

@quasel
Copy link
Member

quasel commented Feb 1, 2018

Well - https://wordpress.org/gutenberg/handbook/templates/#custom-post-types sound like Kind of Layout Templates for me ...

@ladislavsulc
Copy link

Hi, I was looking into Gutenberg and I have to admit from UX perspective I am not very fond of it. I actually have no clue how to incorporate Pods at this moment other than making Pod item accessible as a block. Also no clue about the layout options, at the moment it seems that each component has to be designed that way and they allow only text columns.

Does anyone have an idea how to approach this?

@sc0ttkclark sc0ttkclark modified the milestones: Pods 2.8, Pods 2.9 May 5, 2018
@NicoHood
Copy link

Any updates on this one?

@sc0ttkclark sc0ttkclark modified the milestones: Pods 2.9, Backlog Mar 27, 2021
@sc0ttkclark
Copy link
Member Author

I still want to do this but Pods 2.8 is the current focus. After that is released then our big Gutenberg block editor functionality will be out there and we can start to look at implementations like this.

@pods-framework pods-framework locked and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 11, 2022
@sc0ttkclark sc0ttkclark converted this issue into discussion #6682 Aug 11, 2022
@sc0ttkclark sc0ttkclark modified the milestones: Backlog, Backlog Archive Sep 11, 2022

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
Status: Help Wanted We have not prioritized this yet, but you can help make it happen to speed it up Type: Feature Features that add entirely new functionality that was not there before
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants