You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I use a basic access authentication system on my endpoint using 32 character access codes that are matched first to the user_id and the conversation_id in a db table when a message is received, and if those are not there, then it is a new conversation that needs to be authenticated with an access code.
Now that those values change on every request, I can no longer authenticate without pulling their authentication code out of the message history and checking it every time, and I can no longer track or lock access for access codes to specific users. I can extract potentially matching access codes out of the message history every time, sure, but what good are the user_id and conversation_id if they do not remain consistent between messages?
Is there a solution that allows us to keep track of users and conversations with unique IDs like what we previously had?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I use a basic access authentication system on my endpoint using 32 character access codes that are matched first to the
user_id
and theconversation_id
in a db table when a message is received, and if those are not there, then it is a new conversation that needs to be authenticated with an access code.Now that those values change on every request, I can no longer authenticate without pulling their authentication code out of the message history and checking it every time, and I can no longer track or lock access for access codes to specific users. I can extract potentially matching access codes out of the message history every time, sure, but what good are the
user_id
andconversation_id
if they do not remain consistent between messages?Is there a solution that allows us to keep track of users and conversations with unique IDs like what we previously had?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: