You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for your great work!
When I'm trying to reproduce the result of DIM(Deep Image Matting), I found that using vgg model without BN and setting batch-size to 1 will give the same or even better performance, comparing to the results reported by the original DIM paper.
So I think that fewer training data is not supposed to be the reason for different performance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
VitoChien
changed the title
Possible reason for different performance between DIM Re-implementation and original implementation
Possible reasons for different performance between DIM Re-implementation and original implementation
Nov 5, 2020
Thanks for your great work!
When I'm trying to reproduce the result of DIM(Deep Image Matting), I found that using vgg model without BN and setting batch-size to 1 will give the same or even better performance, comparing to the results reported by the original DIM paper.
So I think that fewer training data is not supposed to be the reason for different performance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: