Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add 978 mhz option to ADSB-receive | option to hop between 978 and 1090 at 1 or 2 second interval. #2510

Open
chris451gh opened this issue Feb 6, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@chris451gh
Copy link

Description of the feature you're suggesting.

ADSB out transmits on 1090 and 978 was added for broadcasts from ground to air and as a secondary ADSB broadcast frequency.
There is consistant activity there. Add a 978 mhz option so the ADSB signals there can be received. Current app assumes only 1090 is needed.
Some aircraft may only operate on 978. Also it may be possible to toggle between 978 and 1090 every second and still pick up traffic on both frequencies. Additional data not in the ADSB format may be transmitted on 978 by an airport with ASR-11 secondary radar.
It may also broadcast mode s locations to aircraft so they see it on ADSB. A mode where the tuner goes to 978 for 1 second then 1090 for the other second may be an effective way to get both signals at nearly the same time. To determine if there is a signal present tune to AM 978 and you should pick up 978 pulses 1 per second. Some transmissions may take 2 cycles (2 seconds) to fill in all the data so maybe a 2 second hop would be more effective. For a test as a minimum just add ability for tuning to 978 manually At the moment there are 2 ups flying within range at least one of them is on 978.. On 1090 there are interrogated responses and on 978 they just broadcast whenever enabled.

Anything else?

No response

@chris451gh chris451gh added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant