You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Point of attention:
At first glance, nothing prevents someone from creating a switch with the "GROUND_DISCONNECTOR" type between 2 busbar sections. However, it does not make any sense.
Thus, using a new type of disconnector could be seen as a weak way to model ground disconnectors.
Another way to model ground disconnectors is to add a new equipment "Ground" and a ground disconnector will just be a disconnector that connects a Ground to the topology.
Question: what kind of equipment would the "Ground" be? It does not look like an Identifiable or an Extendable. Would it be a Singleton? What would be its electrical properties?
NB: in the CGMES import and export, one would have to be careful when converting ground disconnectors. One object in CGMES becomes two objects in IIDM (disconnector + ground)
There is another question about the loadflow calculation: what happen if we decide to close the ground disconnector?
Do we take it into account? If yes, how?
NB: in the current configuration, I think that opening or closing the ground disconnector will have no effect on the loadflow since one side of the ground disconnector is connected to "nothing".
Do you want to request a feature or report a bug?
Feature
What is the current behavior?
GroundDisconnector
are ignored during CGMES import.What is the expected behavior?
GroundDisconnector
objects should be imported as switches during CGMES conversion.What is the motivation / use case for changing the behavior?
It is in CGMES documentation and could be used.
Please tell us about your environment:
Other information
It might be necessary to add another
SwitchKind
(eitherGROUND_DISCONNECTOR
orOTHER
) for switches that do not have defined type.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: