You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A bug. In case of several voltage controls controlling buses that belong to the same non impedant connected set, they are merged. If we have a switch contingency that modify the non impedant connected set, we are not updating the voltage controls to go back to unmerged voltage controls.
Update: this bug could also happen when we run loadflow from network cache after a switch contingency.
What is the current behavior?
The spanning trees are computed once in the beginning. They should be recomputed in case of zero impedance branch enabled/disabled. In order to merge and unmerge voltage controls, we have to rethink about how we merge the voltage control when controlled buses belong to the same zero impedance connected set.
If the current behavior is a bug, please provide the steps to reproduce and if possible a minimal demo of the problem
What is the expected behavior?
What is the motivation / use case for changing the behavior?
Please tell us about your environment:
PowSyBl Version: ...
OS Version: ...
Other information (e.g. detailed explanation, stacktraces, related issues, suggestions how to fix, links for us to have context, eg. stackoverflow, spectrum, etc)
(if a question doesn't apply, you can delete it)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
A bug. In case of several voltage controls controlling buses that belong to the same non impedant connected set, they are merged. If we have a switch contingency that modify the non impedant connected set, we are not updating the voltage controls to go back to unmerged voltage controls.
Update: this bug could also happen when we run loadflow from network cache after a switch contingency.
The spanning trees are computed once in the beginning. They should be recomputed in case of zero impedance branch enabled/disabled. In order to merge and unmerge voltage controls, we have to rethink about how we merge the voltage control when controlled buses belong to the same zero impedance connected set.
If the current behavior is a bug, please provide the steps to reproduce and if possible a minimal demo of the problem
What is the expected behavior?
What is the motivation / use case for changing the behavior?
Please tell us about your environment:
Other information (e.g. detailed explanation, stacktraces, related issues, suggestions how to fix, links for us to have context, eg. stackoverflow, spectrum, etc)
(if a question doesn't apply, you can delete it)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: