You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed that the scalebar incorrectly handles the prefix for reciprocal units, I noticed this when I was trying to measure distances in a Fourrier transform of an image. My original image has a pixel size of 0.007 nm/pixel, but everything is stored in meters, so 7e-12 m. The scalebar has no problem interpreting this value and puts a scalebar in nm on the image.
To calculate the scale of my Fourrier transform, I take the meters value and convert. My image is 4096x4096 pixels so the scale in the FFT is 1/(7e-12 * 4096)=3.4e7 m^-1/pixel. This is equivalent to 0.034 nm^-1/pixel. When I pass the scale in nm^-1 to the scalebar, it uses the correct nm^-1 units. However, when I pass the scale in m^-1, the scalebar uses Gm^-1.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I noticed that the scalebar incorrectly handles the prefix for reciprocal units, I noticed this when I was trying to measure distances in a Fourrier transform of an image. My original image has a pixel size of 0.007 nm/pixel, but everything is stored in meters, so 7e-12 m. The scalebar has no problem interpreting this value and puts a scalebar in nm on the image.
To calculate the scale of my Fourrier transform, I take the meters value and convert. My image is 4096x4096 pixels so the scale in the FFT is 1/(7e-12 * 4096)=3.4e7 m^-1/pixel. This is equivalent to 0.034 nm^-1/pixel. When I pass the scale in nm^-1 to the scalebar, it uses the correct nm^-1 units. However, when I pass the scale in m^-1, the scalebar uses Gm^-1.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: