Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Video module: rendered status failing in gamadservermediation demo #9686

Closed
spormeon opened this issue Mar 18, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

Video module: rendered status failing in gamadservermediation demo #9686

spormeon opened this issue Mar 18, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@spormeon
Copy link

spormeon commented Mar 18, 2023

there seems to be a problem in the video module GAM demo, If i test the bidrequestscheduling demo, the bids get marked as rendered, but if i test the gamadservermediation demo, the bids dont get marked as rendered. This replicates in a live test as well. It is possible to mark bids as rendered with gam, as we do it with our VMAP setup. So i'm guessing there is some problem in the video module somewhere:

bidrequestscheduling:
DevTools_-127_0_0_1_5500_integrationExamples_videoModule_videojs_bidRequestScheduling_html_and_bidRequestScheduling_html—_Prebid_js

gam demo:
DevTools_-_127_0_0_1_5500_integrationExamples_videoModule_videojs_gamAdServerMediation_html

from our VMAP setup:

DevTools_-_cdn_adysis_com_VideoDemo_DemoSite_pages_IncontentDemo_html

we use the following:

PrebidVideoIncontent_js_—Prebid_Publishers__Workspace

@patmmccann patmmccann changed the title Video module problem in gam demo/ live testing Video module: rendered status mismatch Mar 27, 2023
@patmmccann patmmccann changed the title Video module: rendered status mismatch Video module: rendered status mismatch in gamadservermediation demo Mar 27, 2023
@patmmccann patmmccann changed the title Video module: rendered status mismatch in gamadservermediation demo Video module: rendered status failing in gamadservermediation demo Mar 27, 2023
@karimMourra
Copy link
Collaborator

this should be addressed in #9612

@karimMourra
Copy link
Collaborator

@spormeon it appears that this was fixed in #9612. Could you please reopen if the issue persists ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants