You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
exllamav2 has a 4-bit KV cache that has similar ppl to unquantized cache from turboderp's testing. In practice, I find that exllamav2 uses less VRAM than llama.cpp for a given context size as a result. I noticed the exllamav2 benchmark code uses the unquantized cache. Could it be possible to use the 4-bit KV cache again for the memory usage benchmark? Thanks.
See: https://github.com/turboderp/exllamav2/blob/master/doc/qcache_eval.md
exllamav2 has a 4-bit KV cache that has similar ppl to unquantized cache from turboderp's testing. In practice, I find that exllamav2 uses less VRAM than llama.cpp for a given context size as a result. I noticed the exllamav2 benchmark code uses the unquantized cache. Could it be possible to use the 4-bit KV cache again for the memory usage benchmark? Thanks.
For reference, here's the class to use instead: https://github.com/turboderp/exllamav2/blob/009424a6d42d39efceeecd5562450180bd34a7fb/exllamav2/cache.py#L309
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: