-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clarify behavior when over partition capacity #85
Comments
I think this is defined in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis/#section-5.6-6 (end of "Storage Model" in case the link doesn't work), right? We might want to update the CHIPS spec a bit to amend that section to talk about same domain and same partition-key. |
I agree we should use that method. I just wasn't sure if that was your intent in the explainer! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Redirecting from here as it isn't specific to the 1vs10 KB limit.
I think there is an interesting open question that may be worth aligning on as we have a smaller byte cap. From @edgul, implementing this in Gecko:
cc @DCtheTall
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: