-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 423
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Non-volatile version #227
Comments
The idea is that CI systems using Please understand we are a very small team and don't have the time to backport fixes to a released version. |
Of course, this is not what's being requested here.
This seems backwards from how most other projects do things, but ok. So is what I'm reading, that this project has absolutely no plans to offer non-volatile precompiled versions and that any project relying on this must roll their own binary release mirrors? |
Maybe we can introduce some "weekly" or "monthly" releases? If something is broken in these versions, we can always release a "minor" version a couple of days later. |
Volunteers welcome.
John F. Kennedy |
I think there's a bit of unwritten meaning in this sentence -- that (perhaps) you'd want this scripted by someone else. Simply having a project administrator upload a versioned binary release to the releases area on occasion would suffice as a stop-gap for the users that are relying on this. I would expect very few "volunteers" to qualify for this unless they were granted the appropriate access. |
A problem we're facing downstream is we code against
linuxdeployqt/releases/continuous
which is continuously changing.This is great for the casual user that needs to package on their PC from scratch, never having used
linuxdeployqt
before, but it's causing some issues with our CI system.For example, recently
mksquashfs
has been moved internal to thelinuxdeployqt
AppImage, breaking any build systems which had been previously instructed to rely on it.Are there any plans to offer some non-volatile versions so that downstream projects can maintain a baseline?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: