Skip to content

chrome extension #473

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
jawadcode opened this issue Nov 10, 2017 · 9 comments
Closed

chrome extension #473

jawadcode opened this issue Nov 10, 2017 · 9 comments
Labels
Feature Request Proposal for adding a new functionality

Comments

@jawadcode
Copy link

Please could you make this editor a chrome extension

I don't know if this is possible and if I'm wasting your time but please could make this into a chrome extension as it would be impractical as a website?

@catarak
Copy link
Member

catarak commented Nov 12, 2017

thanks for the suggestion! i'm not sure i understand what you mean, as this project is currently a website. could you elaborate further, or include some simple wireframes?

@VictorGaiva
Copy link

VictorGaiva commented Nov 12, 2017

My guess is that you are saying you'd like to be able to use this in chrome as an offline editor, without having do download a program to your computer. Then an extension would make sense.

@jawadcode
Copy link
Author

jawadcode commented Nov 12, 2017 via email

@catarak
Copy link
Member

catarak commented Nov 13, 2017

i agree, that would be awesome! there's a few features i think are higher priority for now, but i've been getting a lot of requests for offline access so we'll see 😄

@catarak catarak added the Feature Request Proposal for adding a new functionality label Nov 13, 2017
@jawadcode
Copy link
Author

jawadcode commented Nov 13, 2017 via email

@himanshuc3
Copy link
Contributor

himanshuc3 commented Apr 17, 2018

I have some knowledge related to making a mozilla extension. I think if we're making an extension, it should probably be universal because mozilla does most of the stuff chrome API is able to do.

@bmoren
Copy link

bmoren commented Apr 1, 2019

some more discussion about offline access over on the forum:

https://discourse.processing.org/t/p5-js-desktop-editor/9728/6

some discussion points that came up:

  • take the code from the current web-editor and compile it as an electron app so it would be a stand alone editor.
  • Another way to do this might be adding support for the Offline Web Applications API directly to the p5 web editor. http://apress.jensimmons.com/v5/pro-html5-programming/ch12.html
  • a build process to include a copy of the reference that is offline.

@catarak
Copy link
Member

catarak commented Apr 3, 2019

i think it would be better to support the offline web applications API—as we learned from the desktop editor, supporting different OS's with an electron app is difficult.

@catarak
Copy link
Member

catarak commented Feb 9, 2021

I'm going through and cleaning up old issues. I believe the way that would make sense to support offline support would be to use a service worker with local storage. (#813 / #103)

@catarak catarak closed this as completed Feb 9, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Feature Request Proposal for adding a new functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants