Edit governance doc to better fit sub-team structure/powers

[drjwbaker]

Spinning out from #1491 a proposal for editing the Governance document:

1. add 'Sub-team calls' to our list of 'Venues for Discussion'.
2. edit 'Monthly Skype calls' to 'Monthly Skype calls (including sub-team reports)'
3. edit:

Members who have a specific interest in an issue (whether in approval or in dissent) are expected to make their voice heard on one of these venues. If any team members object to a course of action, we will not move forward without addressing those objections.

to:

Members who have a specific interest in an issue (whether in approval or in dissent) are expected to make their voice heard on one of these venues. Sub-teams are empowered to make decisions on behalf of the project (with the exception of policy level changes, see below), but must do so in a sufficiently transparent way that if any team members object to a course of action, we will not move forward without addressing those objections."

Pinging team leads: @mdlincoln @svmelton @rivaquiroga @spapastamkou @jenniferisasi @JMParr for comment.

[acrymble]

I support this. I suspect there are situations though where someone may object but we may have a legal obligation or an extremely compelling practical reason for moving ahead anyway. Maybe j ust say attempting to address those objections?

[drjwbaker]

Members who have a specific interest in an issue (whether in approval or in dissent) are expected to make their voice heard on one of these venues. Sub-teams are empowered to make decisions on behalf of the project (with the exception of policy level changes, see below), but must do so in a sufficiently transparent way that if any team members object to a course of action, we will not move forward without seeking to address those objections.

Better?

[drjwbaker]

@acrymble did this not get discussed at #1538?

[acrymble]

Sorry @drjwbaker it looks like we missed it somehow.

[svmelton]

No objections here!

[jenniferisasi]

No objections.

[amsichani]

no objections - thanks for this!

[drjwbaker]

I've made the edit to the Governance Document adding the text above about sub-teams. Happy to reopen if anyone has an objection.