ProgHist Ltd Board of Directors Meeting 17 June 2020

[drjwbaker]

ProgHist Ltd Board of Directors Meeting 17 June 2020

Time: 9:00 AM - Mexico time; 10:00 AM - EST; 3:00 PM - British time; 4:00 PM - CET

Chair: @acrymble
Secretary: @drjwbaker
Members: @amsichani @spapastamkou @drjwbaker @svmelton @rivaquiroga
Minutes of the last meeting: these are not posted publicly. Please see your email from @drjwbaker 13 February 2020.

Agenda

1. Apologies
2. Approval of Minutes from last meeting & actions status
3. ProgHist Directors administration (e.g changes of address)
4. Finance update @drjwbaker
5. Institutional Partner Programme update @drjwbaker
6. Actions arising from AGM ProgHist Ltd Annual General Meeting 28 May 2020 #1694 @acrymble
7. Business administration @drjwbaker
8. Preparing to become a charity in the UK Preparing to become a charity in the UK #1671 @drjwbaker
9. Any Other Business
10. Agree date of next meeting

PLEASE SUGGEST AGENDA ITEMS IN THE TICKET FOR INCLUSION
Note, the remit of the Board of Directors is restricted to the terms of ProgHist Ltd, which - broadly speaking - supports the the financial and legal business of The Programming Historian and its Members (that is, the Editorial Board #1405 (comment)).

Notes

Per our Articles of Association (hit 'View PDF' link) and gov.uk notes on running a company a few notes in terms of procedure for the meeting:

• our quorum is 3 (Article 9.1) and our max size 7 (Article 13)
• we vote, and in split decisions the chair has the casting vote (Article 10.1)
• we need to keep records of decisions (Article 12) and resolutions (GovUK)

[acrymble]

This planned meeting falls during a period when 2 of our directors will be on sabbatical.

As there is no urgent business requiring a meeting to take forward, I'd like to propose to @drjwbaker @rivaquiroga @amsichani @spapastamkou @svmelton that we reschedule this for August 2020. Can you all let me know if you have any objections to that?

[drjwbaker]

No objections.

[amsichani]

I am on sabbatical from July-October, butI m happy to take part in one or two BoD meetings during that period. One issue I want to discuss is the SLA - do we have a deadline for this, how are we going to actually 'sign' it and how /for which reasons are we planning to use it?

[rivaquiroga]

No objections

[spapastamkou]

Ok for me. Sofia Envoyé de mon iPhone

…

Le 1 juin 2020 à 14:40, Riva Quiroga ***@***.***> a écrit :  No objections — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.

[svmelton]

No objections!

[acrymble]

@amsichani do you mean the service agreement in #1704 ?

If so, this has shifted to a Programming Historian Project Team thing of which we are a part. I can make sure we circulate it to each of you for comment before anyone on our team signs it.

I will send along a Doodle poll to re-schedule this for August. Anyone who needs to call an unscheduled meeting is still able to do so in the normal way. I will paste this agenda into the new meeting ticket once that's been agreed.