Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Customize @Builder with not fluent setters to enable JDBI play well. #2233

Closed
gcristian opened this issue Sep 12, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

Comments

@gcristian
Copy link

Feature

To be able to customize @Builder to NOT use fluent setters, in the way @Data is able to do it thru @Accesors.
In order to have Builder classes with the old prefix "setFieldX" as a choice

Describe the target audience
Audience: JDBI users. We need to register a mapper that is able to receive values as "setFieldX". Because JDBI plays well only with muttable objects like @Data, but not with @Builder immutable instances.

@rspilker
Copy link
Collaborator

Will be possible if #2174 is merged back.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants