You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
To be able to customize @Builder to NOT use fluent setters, in the way @Data is able to do it thru @Accesors.
In order to have Builder classes with the old prefix "setFieldX" as a choice
Describe the target audience
Audience: JDBI users. We need to register a mapper that is able to receive values as "setFieldX". Because JDBI plays well only with muttable objects like @Data, but not with @Builder immutable instances.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Feature
To be able to customize
@Builder
to NOT use fluent setters, in the way@Data
is able to do it thru@Accesors.
In order to have Builder classes with the old prefix
"setFieldX"
as a choiceDescribe the target audience
Audience: JDBI users. We need to register a mapper that is able to receive values as
"setFieldX"
. Because JDBI plays well only with muttable objects like@Data
, but not with@Builder
immutable instances.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: