DEPRECATED IN FAVOR OF NEW REPO
This was mostly just an experiment, and parts of this implementation are very bugged. The new repository continues this project, but structured, adhering to Go-lang style, testing, and lots of bug-fixes.
New repository here: protolambda/go-beacon-transition
Code golfed Beacon-state transition implementation by @protolambda.
Submission for Twitter-bounty by Justin Drake: Twitter link Archived tweet
@drakefjustin:
The phase 0 spec (even not fully polished) is slick!
10 ETH bounty to the first person to write in Go (MIT license) the full state transition function (BeaconState, BeaconBlock) -> (BeaconState, Error) in 1,024 lines or less.
27 Feb. 7pm: Challenge accepted. (*insert challenge_accepted.jpeg*)
3 Mar.: Done 🎉
- ~8h of spec python->go porting & interpretation of non-code parts
- ~8h of discussion in chats and GH issues; cutting edges for line limit + going through spec requirements.
The result: a monstrously looking (blame codegolf requirement) but complete spec implementation, in formatted Go.
Even with an absurd line limit, the spec can be implemented.
Now let's get back to work writing (and implementing) an awesome spec. One that is more readable, modular, testable, and useful to the community
Thanks to all ETH 2.0 researchers and implementers for designing such a powerful but minimal specification.
The original intention was to create a transition that is:
- written in Go
- types
- low-level code benefits for speed
- more real-world use-case
- formal-ish & readable -> easier to verify behavior
- executable (alike to previous Python work)
- good for testing
- catch inconsistencies easily with IDE
- fast enough for new experiments
- fuzzing
- benchmark different possible extensions/modifications to the spec
- minimal
- making changes to the spec should be easy
- no dependencies, externals, etc.
- clear definitions
- a spec should not be too big in any case
- making changes to the spec should be easy
Some of these intentions had to be ignored to make the line-limit work at the end, hence we are thinking about starting over, without prioritizing code-golfing.
However, the line limit was also good for some things:
- Found several parts in the spec with small inconsistencies / poor wording
- Submitted a PR to fix some things, more to come.
- Scrutinized the necessity of helper functions. Some of the bigger reductions in line count may actually be welcome in the spec.
- Worked out the non-pseudocode parts of the spec. Some parts of the spec look simple, but actually require lots of data joins and lookups, which we want to avoid. Some PRs may follow out of this to make the spec more implementers friendly.
Further project ideas/goals will be discussed on EthCC, suggestions welcome!
proto beacon-challenge (master)$ bash linecount.bash
file brackets comments blanks not-counting counting full
./challenge/constants.go 0 14 12 26 39 65
./challenge/containers.go 28 85 32 145 149 294
./challenge/crypto_util.go 8 5 5 18 25 43
./challenge/data_types.go 19 11 13 43 58 101
./challenge/math_util.go 9 1 5 15 22 37
./challenge/shuffling.go 9 35 5 49 36 85
./challenge/ssz_util.go 24 47 10 81 104 185
./challenge/transition.go 250 201 115 566 598 1164
total counting lines: 1031
concatenate the files, and you get 1024 (reduce package name lines for 7/8 files) (or less, if you reduce duplicate imports)
Git ref of beacon spec used for this challenge: 8df7de150e68408b78d6488a6f4c9cf8e18c4405 (dev branch around time of the challenge).
bash linecount.bash
Yes this is bad. But fun, and code golfing = more scrutiny towards spec, we look more at the necessity of functions. I.e. the spec improves in the process.
MIT. Container types are adapted from CC0-licensed types in original ETH 2.0 specification doc.