Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Number of perimeters for solid infill layers #2151

Open
espr14 opened this issue Apr 21, 2019 · 7 comments
Open

Number of perimeters for solid infill layers #2151

espr14 opened this issue Apr 21, 2019 · 7 comments
Labels
enhancement improve an existing feature or functionality in the software solid infill

Comments

@espr14
Copy link
Contributor

espr14 commented Apr 21, 2019

1.42.0 b2 win64

Perimeters are kind of solid infill. Perimeters copy shape better but infill looks better in the area. So it would be good to allow to decrease or increase number of perimeters for areas with solid infill. Even no perimeter makes sense.

perimeter1
perimeter2
perimeter3
perimeter4

@supermerill
Copy link
Contributor

Perimeters copy shape better but infill looks better in the area.

gap-fill is needed between perimeters, because it's not a good way to fill an area. rectilinear is more efficient (but for some angles). Your last picture may be problematic, as the shell will look horrible.
If we want nice looking shell + efficient filling, the current solution of some perimeters+rectilinear is the best solution (imo).

@espr14
Copy link
Contributor Author

espr14 commented Apr 23, 2019

Last image is extreme. However, imagine this: I want all walls to be thick at least 10 perimeters. But with 10 perimeters the bottom and top layers will look weird. Since the solid infill make the layer strong enough, we don't need extra perimeters. One or two perimeters are needed to make the shape smooth and to have something the infill can catch on.

In case of circular object and Archimedean chord there's no need for perimeter at all.

@supermerill
Copy link
Contributor

supermerill commented Apr 23, 2019

But with 10 perimeters the bottom and top layers will look weird. Since the solid infill make the layer strong enough, we don't need extra perimeters

I created a "only one perimeter on top surfaces", see #821
You can try it in my fork. If there are an interest from prusa for that, i can re-create a pr.
I don't know if it's really that useful for the bottom layer.

@espr14
Copy link
Contributor Author

espr14 commented Apr 23, 2019

Sometimes it is more useful for the bottom layer. For example parts for Prusa i3 MK2, MK3 are designed so the bottom layer is the visible one.

@supermerill
Copy link
Contributor

what i mean is that my bottom layer is pushed hard against the build plate and so i can't see any pattern on it..

@espr14
Copy link
Contributor Author

espr14 commented Apr 23, 2019

It's more about the material and manufacturer. In my case neither hard pressure nor 110 °C helps.

@bubnikv bubnikv added the enhancement improve an existing feature or functionality in the software label May 4, 2019
@MagnusThome
Copy link

MagnusThome commented Feb 13, 2023

I really miss the option of one single perimeter on the top layer (like SuperSlicer has)

As also mentioned here #7986 with the picture below really showing the benefit of this!

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement improve an existing feature or functionality in the software solid infill
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants