Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ProcessPreGenesisDeposits: Remove context.TODO() usage #8705

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 5, 2021

Conversation

terencechain
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this?

Bug fix

What does this PR do? Why is it needed?

Not a fan of passing context.TODO() to ProcessPreGenesisDeposits. This fixes to use parent context

@terencechain terencechain requested a review from a team as a code owner April 3, 2021 18:39
@terencechain terencechain self-assigned this Apr 3, 2021
rkapka
rkapka previously approved these changes Apr 3, 2021
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 3, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #8705 (fa39b33) into develop (1c6c058) will decrease coverage by 0.05%.
The diff coverage is 75.00%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #8705      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    61.47%   61.41%   -0.06%     
===========================================
  Files          499      499              
  Lines        34789    34791       +2     
===========================================
- Hits         21386    21368      -18     
- Misses       10230    10250      +20     
  Partials      3173     3173              

farazdagi
farazdagi previously approved these changes Apr 4, 2021
@farazdagi farazdagi dismissed stale reviews from rkapka and themself via 38eb428 April 4, 2021 17:05
@prylabs-bulldozer prylabs-bulldozer bot merged commit 01eb77c into develop Apr 5, 2021
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the fix-context-todo branch April 5, 2021 15:08
@terencechain terencechain mentioned this pull request Apr 7, 2021
62 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants