Legacy /map/ nodes on publiclab.org need updating

[ebarry]

I ran into this old content type when speaking with one of the earliest contributors to Public Lab. Map content in URLs formatted like /map/

• They display, but can't be edited
• They have authors, but this is hardcoded and not linked to publiclab.org author profiles
• They can be "liked" but the icon for liking is duplicated on the other side of the content, and only the "wrong" one works.
• Tags can be added to them so that they show up in search results, but without tagging them The Google search does not search their title or body content

More detail

Check out this gif where the "star" icon in the right sidebar does not work, while an unexpected star icon on the left does work:

Seen on: https://publiclab.org/map/tlc-youth-center-nsambya-rd-kampala-uganda/2012-11-09

Ideally, their would only be one star icon, it would be in the right sidebar, and it would function. :)

[ebarry]

More on map nodes:
Here's what happens when i try to edit the content to update it to correct inaccuracies that the original author told me about.

What i would change if i could :

• add two authors
• edit title for accuracy

[ebarry]

Crossposting a comment i left in the chat, /map/ type nodes aren't covered by the google search.
If they do not have tags (and most don't as they pre-date our extensive use of taging), the Google search seems to not search their title or body content.

[Forchapeatl]

I would love to work on this issue, may I ?

[jywarren]

Hi all! This is part of our giant "Deprecate legacy systems" project, and we have a plan to port all of this type over to be notes, at #4072, as a part of #956.

I saw that Google searching on PublicLab.org does seem to work for me: https://publiclab.org/search/kamwokya shows:

https://publiclab.org/search?q=csikszentmihalyi also shows this page as a result, so it is searching the whole page -- Google search doesn't actually distinguish fields, it just searches all page text.

@ebarry if you're not seeing this, can you show us what you see when you search?

I'm closing this in favor of #4072 and will add more detail there - @Forchapeatl we would love your help with it!