You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
puppetlabs/puppet-specifications#157 introduced an allowlist for files and directories in a puppet module. code-manager already has an option to exclude spec files. In setups with many environments and/or many modules the amount of useless files in the codedirs are quite high. That costs disk space, inodes and performance. filesync operations are heavily reduced by a huge amount of small files.
Describe the Solution You Would Like
I want a strict option in code-manager that only deploys files that are allowed by the new puppet module layout specification. Ideally this gets implemented directly into r10k.
Describe Alternatives You've Considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.
Additional Context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hey people, any chance this is going to be implemented soon? This is caused a lot of issues on big installations due to the amount of required IO and the amount of time for filesyncs to compilers.
Use Case
puppetlabs/puppet-specifications#157 introduced an allowlist for files and directories in a puppet module. code-manager already has an option to exclude spec files. In setups with many environments and/or many modules the amount of useless files in the codedirs are quite high. That costs disk space, inodes and performance. filesync operations are heavily reduced by a huge amount of small files.
Describe the Solution You Would Like
I want a
strict
option in code-manager that only deploys files that are allowed by the new puppet module layout specification. Ideally this gets implemented directly into r10k.Describe Alternatives You've Considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.
Additional Context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: