Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

code-manager should adhere the new puppet module layout specification #40

Open
bastelfreak opened this issue May 28, 2024 · 2 comments
Open
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@bastelfreak
Copy link

Use Case

puppetlabs/puppet-specifications#157 introduced an allowlist for files and directories in a puppet module. code-manager already has an option to exclude spec files. In setups with many environments and/or many modules the amount of useless files in the codedirs are quite high. That costs disk space, inodes and performance. filesync operations are heavily reduced by a huge amount of small files.

Describe the Solution You Would Like

I want a strict option in code-manager that only deploys files that are allowed by the new puppet module layout specification. Ideally this gets implemented directly into r10k.

Describe Alternatives You've Considered

A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

Additional Context

Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

@bastelfreak bastelfreak added the enhancement New feature or request label May 28, 2024
@bastelfreak
Copy link
Author

Hey people, any chance this is going to be implemented soon? This is caused a lot of issues on big installations due to the amount of required IO and the amount of time for filesyncs to compilers.

@bastelfreak
Copy link
Author

IMO this should be implemented in r10k: puppetlabs/r10k#1387
And then code-manager should be able to use that feature

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant