You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
How would this feature be useful?
The comparison to other tools in pipx's docs is really useful IMO.
Another tool people might want to compare pipx to is fades, which is more focused on the idea of specifying all of one's dependencies in a single Python script than on running whole packages, but it has some overlap with pipx in both regards: AFAICT, pipx also supports specifying dependencies in a single file since #916 and fades supports running single files directly from remote resources (but not packages, again AFAICT).
Describe the solution you'd like
It would be great if there was another section on the comparison page comparing pipx to fades.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Draw this comparison on some other PyPA page dedicated to this topic if it exists?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
How would this feature be useful?
The comparison to other tools in pipx's docs is really useful IMO.
Another tool people might want to compare pipx to is fades, which is more focused on the idea of specifying all of one's dependencies in a single Python script than on running whole packages, but it has some overlap with pipx in both regards: AFAICT, pipx also supports specifying dependencies in a single file since #916 and fades supports running single files directly from remote resources (but not packages, again AFAICT).
Describe the solution you'd like
It would be great if there was another section on the comparison page comparing pipx to fades.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Draw this comparison on some other PyPA page dedicated to this topic if it exists?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: