-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 212
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Issue with powerplantsmatching #349
Comments
Thanks @ekatef for reporting the issue!
|
@davide-f, many thanks for the suggestion and instructions! :) |
UPD: Have tried both reinstallation of During the By the way, @davide-f could please you verify please if the following line is applicable globally: UPD2: The glpk solver is also not particularly happy by the system variables with the It looks like some system-dependent additional adjustments may be needed to make the whole workflow run if energy modelling packages are not pre-installed. |
This error is surprising. Regarding the gplk is the first time we experience such issue; is that problem reproducible? have you experienced that problem also before? |
@davide-f, many thanks for looking into this. No, the issue with gplk is not familiar for me. Regarding the problem specifics you are absolutely right: it seems that only one generator remains in the dataframe after |
I can reproduce the issue as well; I think it is a bug in ppl to be investigated. |
That's great to know that the issue is reproducible :) @davide-f, thank you so much for your help! |
I've investigated the issue. |
@davide-f That's genial :) I'ld say not obvious at all... |
I'm facing this issue again after returning to the mainstream @davide-f, would be very grateful for any ideas on how to fix it :) |
Install the version from main, not the conda release. |
@davide-f, thanks for the suggestion! The issue was resolved with changing the source of ppm installation from conda distribution to installation from ppm repo via pip. In case this issue is reproducible, does it probably makes sense to update the environment settings? |
@ekatef , ppm get soon an update. Let's wait |
@pz-max, great to know! Thanks for the information. Actually, it looks like the updated ppm version works like a charm :) Have checked Vietnam where a similar issue was experienced previously, and it appears that the current main-ppm version successfully resolves that as well. Just in case the temporary fix is to replace the source for powerplantmatching in |
I'm currently setting the model from scratch and have some misunderstandings with powerplantsmatching. Would be very grateful for any suggestions.
Checklist
main
branch or the latest release. Please indicate.pypsa-africa
environment. Update viaconda env update -f envs/environment.yaml
.Describe the Bug
Run of the
build_powerplants
rule leads to anAssertionError: No matches found
caused bypm.powerplants(from_url=False, update=True, config=config)
. All settings in the config correspond to theconfig.default.yaml
exceptcountries: ["CD"]
andretrieve_databundle: false
.The data files with loaded from zenodo manuallly (there were some troubles during automated loading probably due to some tricks of network connection). But structure of the data directories corresponds to one implied by the model and it doesn't look suspicious...
Error message
If applicable, paste any terminal output to help illustrating your problem.
In some cases it may also be useful to share your list of installed packages:
conda list
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: