Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should catkin_pip bring along it s dependencies ? #52

Open
asmodehn opened this issue Nov 10, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

Should catkin_pip bring along it s dependencies ? #52

asmodehn opened this issue Nov 10, 2016 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@asmodehn
Copy link
Member

Like python-pytest... I was naively assuming that catkin_pip would install all the dependencies used most of the time...

Maybe we should focus on the python packaging guide to install these "official" tools, but let the user specify other tools if he wants to ?

@asmodehn
Copy link
Member Author

asmodehn commented Jan 2, 2017

another idea : maybe these should be "extra" addons to catkin & catkin_pip
=> one addon per extra tool not used in catkin (ex. pytest), but basic catkin_pip override all catkin_tools (ex. nose)

@asmodehn
Copy link
Member Author

Maybe the best way is to have a catkin_pip_env_install() command that will, from cmake script at configuration, install packages from pip into catkin_pip_env. and we call that from the other functions that need it...
We probably need a bunch of requirements files...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant