feat(annotations): allow creating multiple annotations for different apps

[eh-am]

support passing an appNames array

[github-actions]

size-limit report 📦

Path	Size	Loading time (3g)	Running time (snapdragon)	Total time
webapp/public/assets/app.js	443.61 KB (0%)	8.9 s (0%)	4 s (+52.4% 🔺)	12.9 s
webapp/public/assets/app.css	17.09 KB (0%)	342 ms (0%)	0 ms (+100% 🔺)	342 ms
webapp/public/assets/styles.css	9.5 KB (0%)	191 ms (0%)	0 ms (+100% 🔺)	191 ms
packages/pyroscope-flamegraph/dist/index.js	92.18 KB (0%)	1.9 s (0%)	1.1 s (-4.36% 🔽)	3 s
packages/pyroscope-flamegraph/dist/index.node.js	92.08 KB (0%)	1.9 s (0%)	738 ms (+43.26% 🔺)	2.6 s
packages/pyroscope-flamegraph/dist/index.css	7.39 KB (0%)	148 ms (0%)	0 ms (+100% 🔺)	148 ms

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 66.63% // Head: 66.63% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (6b7ea81) compared to base (23c649d).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1562   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   66.63%   66.63%           
=======================================
  Files         147      147           
  Lines        4998     4998           
  Branches     1155     1155           
=======================================
  Hits         3330     3330           
  Misses       1664     1664           
  Partials        4        4           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[eh-am]

/create-server

[korniltsev]

nit: I am not sure having both fields is a good idea, maybe just keep one array field AppNames?

[eh-am]

@korniltsev

nit: I am not sure having both fields is a good idea, maybe just keep one array field AppNames?

Haha @petethepig and I discussed quite a lot about it, I wasn't so fond of it at the beginnig, but I guess the decision is that appName works well when you are creating a single annotation (eg via UI, which returns a single annotation), and appNames is just a utility for when creating via the API.