Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug: San Jose AirVPN servers not recognised #2323

Closed
Daniel15 opened this issue Jun 17, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed

Bug: San Jose AirVPN servers not recognised #2323

Daniel15 opened this issue Jun 17, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@Daniel15
Copy link

Is this urgent?

No

Host OS

Unraid

CPU arch

x86_64

VPN service provider

AirVPN

What are you using to run the container

Unraid

What is the version of Gluetun

Running version latest built on 2024-05-18T18:08:57.405Z (commit 4218dba)

What's the problem 🤔

Unable to connect to San Jose AirVPN servers

I ran this command to update the server list, but it still doesn't work:

docker run --rm -v /mnt/fast/appdata/gluetun:/gluetun qmcgaw/gluetun update -enduser -providers airvpn

Share your logs (at least 10 lines)

Running version latest built on 2024-05-18T18:08:57.405Z (commit 4218dba)

🔧 Need help? https://github.com/qdm12/gluetun/discussions/new
🐛 Bug? https://github.com/qdm12/gluetun/issues/new
✨ New feature? https://github.com/qdm12/gluetun/issues/new
☕ Discussion? https://github.com/qdm12/gluetun/discussions/new
💻 Email? quentin.mcgaw@gmail.com
💰 Help me? https://www.paypal.me/qmcgaw https://github.com/sponsors/qdm12
2024-06-16T21:59:25-07:00 INFO [routing] default route found: interface eth0, gateway 172.19.0.1, assigned IP 172.19.0.2 and family v4
2024-06-16T21:59:25-07:00 INFO [routing] local ethernet link found: eth0
2024-06-16T21:59:25-07:00 INFO [routing] local ipnet found: 172.19.0.0/16
2024-06-16T21:59:25-07:00 INFO [firewall] enabling...
2024-06-16T21:59:25-07:00 INFO [firewall] enabled successfully
2024-06-16T21:59:26-07:00 INFO [storage] merging by most recent 19425 hardcoded servers and 19425 servers read from /gluetun/servers.json
2024-06-16T21:59:26-07:00 ERROR VPN settings: provider settings: server selection: for VPN service provider airvpn: the city specified is not valid: value is not one of the possible choices: value San Jose, choices available are Alblasserdam, Atlanta Georgia, Auckland, Barcelona, Belgrade, Berlin, Brussels, Bucharest, Chicago Illinois, Dallas Texas, Dublin, Frankfurt, Jacksonville Florida, Kiev, London, Los Angeles, Madrid, Manchester, Miami, Montreal, Munich, New York City, Oslo, Pennsylvania, Phoenix Arizona, Prague, Riga, Sao Paulo, Singapore, Sofia, Stockholm, Tallinn, Tokyo, Toronto Ontario, Uppsala, Vancouver, Vienna, Zurich
2024-06-16T21:59:26-07:00 INFO Shutdown successful


### Share your configuration

```yml
Not relevant
Copy link
Contributor

@qdm12 is more or less the only maintainer of this project and works on it in his free time.
Please:

@brianyuen
Copy link

You'll need to set your VPN_SERVICE_PROVIDER to 'custom'. I'm currently connected to a server in San Jose using wireguard https://forums.unraid.net/topic/111725-support-diamondprecisioncomputing-all-images-and-files/page/12/#comment-1395578

@qdm12
Copy link
Owner

qdm12 commented Jul 26, 2024

The servers data is obtained from https://airvpn.org/api/status which contains some san jose servers.
I just ran the update locally and the city San Jose California is now in the servers data. Maybe airvpn did not add these new servers to their API yet, and now it's done? Closing this assuming this is resolved, but feel free to open a new issue if it's not!

@qdm12 qdm12 closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jul 26, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Closed issues are NOT monitored, so commenting here is likely to be not seen.
If you think this is still unresolved and have more information to bring, please create another issue.

This is an automated comment setup because @qdm12 is the sole maintainer of this project
which became too popular to monitor issues closed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants