Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a new tutorial: deuteron binding energy #559

Closed
jvscursulim opened this issue Feb 14, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #580
Closed

Add a new tutorial: deuteron binding energy #559

jvscursulim opened this issue Feb 14, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #580
Labels
type: feature request New feature or request

Comments

@jvscursulim
Copy link
Contributor

What should we add?

Hi everyone,

I've participated in the project Add Qiskit Nature demonstrations for physics problems (qiskit-advocate/qamp-fall-21#27) of Qiskit Advocate Mentorship Program 2021 Fall, and one of the goals of our group was the development of a tutorial explaining how someone could use Qiskit Nature tools to solve a physical problem. Then, I'm here to present the tutorial about the binding energy in Deuteron that I wrote, and ask you all to take a look and analyze if this work should become a PR and really be considered to be added in the Qiskit Nature tutorials.

Tutorial link: https://github.com/jvscursulim/Qiskit-Tutorials/blob/main/11_deuteron_binding_energy.ipynb

@jvscursulim jvscursulim added the type: feature request New feature or request label Feb 14, 2022
@pbark
Copy link
Contributor

pbark commented Feb 24, 2022

Hi @jvscursulim, thank you very much for bringing up this point! I had a look in the notebook and it is really interesting. The only concern I have for now is that in the notebook is more a collection of tools that are used to implement a specific problem and although it is demonstrating how qiskit nature can de used is not directly within the concept of tutorials with follow in qiskit. I would say that you can open a PR so that we can help cleaning up some parts of the code to make them more user friendly and at the same we can try to extract pieces that can possibly be used within the core qiskit Nature code basis. Tagging also @woodsp-ibm!

@jvscursulim
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the comments @pbark. I'll open the PR with the tutorial.

@1ucian0 1ucian0 linked a pull request Jun 15, 2022 that will close this issue
@mergify mergify bot closed this as completed in #580 Aug 12, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: feature request New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants