You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Software article titled "pyGNMF: A Python library for implementation of generalised non-negative matrix factorisation method" available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2022.101257
GNMF method does not make any assumption about the structure of the uncertainty matrix and can also be a dense matrix.
Feel free to look at the mentioned papers. I have spent quite some time optimising the code so that it runs as fast as possible. However, I was not able complete the error estimation part in the pyGNMF method and thus was published without it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you for these resources @niravlekinwala. We will take a look at the GNMF algorithm that you developed in your article, as well as the pyGNMF package that you published.
During my PhD, I have tried to solve the same issue of using NMF based methods for source apportionment. Please check the papers out:
GNMF method does not make any assumption about the structure of the uncertainty matrix and can also be a dense matrix.
Feel free to look at the mentioned papers. I have spent quite some time optimising the code so that it runs as fast as possible. However, I was not able complete the error estimation part in the pyGNMF method and thus was published without it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: