Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Did you get a chance to look at some similar papers? #10

Open
niravlekinwala opened this issue Nov 10, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Did you get a chance to look at some similar papers? #10

niravlekinwala opened this issue Nov 10, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@niravlekinwala
Copy link

During my PhD, I have tried to solve the same issue of using NMF based methods for source apportionment. Please check the papers out:

  1. Main article titled "Generalised non-negative matrix factorisation for air pollution source apportionment" available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156294
  2. Software article titled "pyGNMF: A Python library for implementation of generalised non-negative matrix factorisation method" available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2022.101257

GNMF method does not make any assumption about the structure of the uncertainty matrix and can also be a dense matrix.

Feel free to look at the mentioned papers. I have spent quite some time optimising the code so that it runs as fast as possible. However, I was not able complete the error estimation part in the pyGNMF method and thus was published without it.

@deronsmith
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for these resources @niravlekinwala. We will take a look at the GNMF algorithm that you developed in your article, as well as the pyGNMF package that you published.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants