You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Background
In the model, the attribute waste_outputs can be specified for CHPs. It is used to make sure that the output of steam_hot_water is discounted in the marginal costs of the CHP. This is however only done for CHPs with a steam turbine, as is explained in the documentation.
Issue
Based on the node file on ETSource alone, it is hard to tell whether the waste_outputs attribute has been intentionally left out for a CHP, or whether it has been forgotten. If you don't thoroughly read the documentation, you might think that it has been forgotten.
Solution
Add validation for waste_outputs for CHPs. We could add a group that excludes a CHP from requiring the waste_outputs attribute. The validation would then fail if a CHP has the group AND waste_outputs, or when the CHP does not have the group NOR waste_outputs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Background
In the model, the attribute
waste_outputs
can be specified for CHPs. It is used to make sure that the output ofsteam_hot_water
is discounted in the marginal costs of the CHP. This is however only done for CHPs with a steam turbine, as is explained in the documentation.Issue
Based on the node file on ETSource alone, it is hard to tell whether the
waste_outputs
attribute has been intentionally left out for a CHP, or whether it has been forgotten. If you don't thoroughly read the documentation, you might think that it has been forgotten.Solution
Add validation for
waste_outputs
for CHPs. We could add a group that excludes a CHP from requiring thewaste_outputs
attribute. The validation would then fail if a CHP has the group ANDwaste_outputs
, or when the CHP does not have the group NORwaste_outputs
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: