Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Roundtrip efficiency not shown properly in technical & financial properties #4282

Open
mabijkerk opened this issue Jun 4, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
Pinned Will never be marked as stale or auto-closed.

Comments

@mabijkerk
Copy link
Member

When I open a blank scenario for the Netherlands and go to technical & financial properties for electric cars in the Electricity storage section, I get the following table:

Screenshot 2024-06-04 at 10 50 44

A first minor issue is that the title says "Relative storage volume" instead of something like "Electric cars". The main issue however is that the roundtrip efficiency is stated to be 0%, while the node transport_car_flexiblity_p2p_electricity clearly states an output.electricity of 0.87. This is likely related to the definition of the presentation_group v2g in ETEngine.

@kaskranenburgQ or @kndehaan could either of you look into this at some point?

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 4, 2024

This issue has had no activity for 60 days and will be closed in 7 days. Removing the "Stale" label or posting a comment will prevent it from being closed automatically. You can also add the "Pinned" label to ensure it isn't marked as stale in the future.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale Issue had no activity for 60 days and will be, or has been, closed. label Aug 4, 2024
@mabijkerk mabijkerk added Pinned Will never be marked as stale or auto-closed. and removed Stale Issue had no activity for 60 days and will be, or has been, closed. labels Aug 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Pinned Will never be marked as stale or auto-closed.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants