You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In this scenario we see that the heat in- and output does not match.
If we zoom in on the heat flows we see the following:
The biomass and network gas flows are equal (both 0.93 PJ)
This is because in the query behind the biomass flows to heat, we count the greengas/network gas flow that is used in heat production.
This flow is also accounted for in the network gas to heat query.
I therefore propose we remove this flow from the biomass to heat query. @mabijkerk@kndehaan what do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In this scenario we see that the heat in- and output does not match.
If we zoom in on the heat flows we see the following:
The biomass and network gas flows are equal (both 0.93 PJ)
This is because in the query behind the biomass flows to heat, we count the greengas/network gas flow that is used in heat production.
This flow is also accounted for in the network gas to heat query.
I therefore propose we remove this flow from the biomass to heat query.
@mabijkerk @kndehaan what do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: