You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This repo uses a "main" branch while the mono-repo (where this repo is sourced from) uses the "master" branch. While I have no special attachment to either names¹, I do have a special attachment to consistency and propose one of these solutions:
A. The "easy" solution: Rename the branch here to "master"
B. The "laborous" solution: Rename all "master" branches in all projects and the mono-repo to "main"
This consistency is somewhat important because you have to be extra careful to use the proper branch when pushing this stuff to GitHub.
¹ Another thing would be "master-slave" formulation in other contexts, which I do consider inappropriate in a modern age.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This repo uses a "main" branch while the mono-repo (where this repo is sourced from) uses the "master" branch. While I have no special attachment to either names¹, I do have a special attachment to consistency and propose one of these solutions:
A. The "easy" solution: Rename the branch here to "master"
B. The "laborous" solution: Rename all "master" branches in all projects and the mono-repo to "main"
This consistency is somewhat important because you have to be extra careful to use the proper branch when pushing this stuff to GitHub.
¹ Another thing would be "master-slave" formulation in other contexts, which I do consider inappropriate in a modern age.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: