We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
We should create a check-rchk composite action, which will make it easier to run rchk on GitHub Actions.
It would be useful to use in cpp11 and other packages which have a lot of C or C++ code.
It can be an adapted from what is used in arrow's CI.
https://github.com/ursacomputing/crossbow/actions/runs/1120719523/workflow#L53-L76
cc @nealrichardson
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Here's the section of workflow where we use rchk: https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/dev/tasks/r/github.linux.rchk.yml#L53-L77
Sorry, something went wrong.
We do already have https://github.com/r-lib/actions/tree/master/run-rchk to run rchk, but I think the way you are doing it feels somehow more natural than the previous approach.
This issue has been automatically locked. If you believe you have found a related problem, please file a new issue and include a link to this issue
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
We should create a check-rchk composite action, which will make it easier to run rchk on GitHub Actions.
It would be useful to use in cpp11 and other packages which have a lot of C or C++ code.
It can be an adapted from what is used in arrow's CI.
https://github.com/ursacomputing/crossbow/actions/runs/1120719523/workflow#L53-L76
cc @nealrichardson
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: