We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
With the rise of rlang, does it make sense to add quosure evaluation functionality?
Ex:
safe <- function(expr, ...) { expr <- rlang::enquo(expr) callr::r(function(e) rlang::eval_tidy(e), list(e = expr), ...) } # Direct usage safe(cat("1", file = "test.txt")) # Programmatic usage exp <- quote(cat("2", file = "test.txt")) safe(!!exp) x <- "3" safe(cat(!!x, file = "test.txt"))
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Talked with Gabor. Keeping this function out of callr for the time being.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
With the rise of rlang, does it make sense to add quosure evaluation functionality?
Ex:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: